Legal Opinion
Rushing v. United Airlines
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 27, 1996No. 94 C 5075PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Leon Rushing (“Rushing”) has brought this action by reason of claimed sexual harassment on the part of Guy Montes (“Montes”), his supervisor at their joint employer United Airlines (“United”). Rushing asserts both a statutory claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII,” 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17) 1 and supplemental state law claims charging intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence in training and supervision, and ratification.
Defendants now move for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Valerie A. Baskerville v. Culligan International CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Marguerite Hicks v. The Gates Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Johnson v. Community Nursing ServicesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1996
- Maksimovic v. TsogalisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- Rettiger v. IBP, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997
- Lacy v. Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Contreras v. Suncast Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.