Legal Opinion

Contreras v. Suncast Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 12, 2001No. 00 C 2679PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ALESIA, District Judge.

Before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c). For the following reasons, the court grants defendants’ motion for summary judgment on all counts.

I. BACKGROUND 1

A. Factual background

Plaintiff Contreras, a United States citizen born in Mexico, was hired as a forklift operator at defendant Suncast Corporation’s (“Suncast”) Batvia, Illinois manufacturing facility on November 14, 1994. During Contreras’s employment, Thomas Tisbo (“Tisbo”) was Suncast’s President, Michael Hamilton…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Fairmont Chicago HotelDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  2. DeFronzo v. Conopco, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
  3. Perez v. Globe Ground North America, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API