Legal Opinion
Rettiger v. IBP, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided September 15, 1997No. 96-4105-SACPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, Senior District Judge.
This employment discrimination case comes before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. (Dk.29). The plaintiff, Cecelia Rettiger (“Rettiger”), brings this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, alleging sexual harassment claims of hostile work environment and quid pro quo discrimination and a retaliation claim based on adverse actions taken after her complaints of sexual harassment. The defendant IBP, Inc. (“IBP”) argues it is entitled to summary judgment as the plaintiff cannot prove…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Daneshvar v. Graphic Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- White v. Midwest Office Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- Haug v. City of Topeka, Equipment Management DivisionDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- Stahl v. Board of Commissioners of the Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas CityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Zinn v. McKuneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.