Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brenny v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 7, 2012No. A11-1339Published

1DissentStauber, Judge

I respectfully dissent and would affirm the district court’s decision. In order to maintain a prima facie claim of tortious interference with contract, Ms. Brenny was required to show “(1) the existence of a contract, (2) that defendant knew of the contract, (3) that defendant intentionally procured a breach of the contract without justification, and (4) that plaintiff suffered injuries as a direct result of the breach.” Howard v. Minn. Timberwolves Basketball Ltd. P’ship, 636 N.W.2d 551, 559 (Minn.App.2001). It is true that an employee may interfere with or cause a breach of another…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nordling v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  2. Willis v. County of SherburneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. Howard v. Minnesota Timberwolves Basketball Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Williams v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIV.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API