Legal Opinion

Staefa Control-System Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 18, 1994No. C-93-2224 MHP (ENE)PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PATEL, District Judge.

This diversity action was brought by plaintiff, Staefa Control System, Inc. (“Staefa”), against defendants, St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company and St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company (collectively “St. Paul”), seeking a declaratory judgment that St. Paul has a duty to defend and indemnify Staefa in an underlying tort action. In addition, Staefa alleges that St. Paul’s failure to defend Staefa amounts to breach of insurance contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and seeks both actual and punitive damages.

Now before the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. MacKinnon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Martin Marietta Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Legarra v. Federated Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Hocker Oil Co. v. Barker-Phillips-Jackson, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Sentex Systems, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API