Legal Opinion

Rath v. Rath

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2013No. 20130184PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Mark Rath appeals from an order denying his motion to hold Kayla Rath in contempt and denying his request that the district court judge recuse himself from the case. We affirm, concluding the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the contempt motion and request for recusal.

I

[¶ 2] The parties were divorced in January 2018 and Kayla Rath was awarded primary residential responsibility for the couple’s two minor children. Mark Rath was awarded supervised parenting time to occur at the Family Safety Center while he was undergoing a domestic violence offender…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Barstad v. BarstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Gould v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Flattum-Riemers v. Flattum-RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Datz v. DoschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Grasser v. GrasserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API