Legal Opinion

Rath v. Rath

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 2018No. 20170419PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jensen, Justice.

[¶ 1] Mark Rath appeals from an order denying his motion to amend the parties' parenting time schedule to allow an overnight, out-of-state family vacation during the summer of 2018 and awarding attorney fees to Kayla Rath. He argues the district court improperly denied his motion to amend the parties' parenting time schedule and abused its discretion in awarding attorney fees. Mark Rath further asserts the trial judge acted prejudicially and with bias, warranting immediate recusal and relief through this Court's issuance of a supervisory writ. We affirm the district court's…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Siewert v. SiewertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. ZiebarthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Williston v. SolbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Krump-Wooton v. KrumpNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Krump-Wooton v. KrumpNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API