Legal Opinion

in Re Commitment of Carlos Cortez

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided June 27, 2013No. 09-12-00385-CVPublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID GAULTNEY, Justice.

In this appeal concerning the modification of the residency requirement for a sexually violent predator, this Court lacks appellate jurisdiction because the order in question is not a final order. In response to an inquiry from this Court, appellant asks that in the event the Court decides that one or more of the issues raised in appellant’s brief may not be reviewed on appeal due to a lack of appellate jurisdiction, this Court alternatively consider the brief of appellant as a request for mandamus relief. A certification pursuant to Rule 52.3(j) was filed. See…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Davidson v. CannonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. In Re D. Wilson Const. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. In re Commitment of MayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. in Re Commitment of David Dodson, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2014
  3. in Re Clarence D. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  4. Ex Parte Calvin Poest v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2024
  5. Gerard Matzen v. Marsha McLane, Director of the Texas Civil Commitment Office, and the Texas Civil Commitment OfficeTexas Supreme Court · 2021

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API