Legal Opinion

in Re Clarence D. Brown

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 1, 2016No. 09-16-00072-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STEVE McKEITHEN, Chief Justice

In this mandamus proceeding, Clarence D. Brown complains that the trial court abused its discretion by denying Brown’s motion for appointment of counsel, by granting the State’s motion to place Brown in a tiered sex offender treatment program, and by amending an order of civil commitment to require that Brown participate in sex offender treatment and supervision provided by the Texas Civil Commitment Office (TCCO). On October 21, 2015, the trial court signed the orders to implement Brown’s transition from supervision and treatment by the Office of Violent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gibson v. TolbertTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. in Re Commitment of Carlos Cortez, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2013
  3. In re DeanTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  4. In re Commitment of MayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re StateTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Tex. Civil Commitment Office v. HartshornCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API