Legal Opinion

In re Commitment of May

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 28, 2016No. 09-15-00513-CVPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEANNE JOHNSON, Justice

The State of Texas appealed an order releasing Alonzo May from civil commitment as a sexually violent predator. We reverse the trial court and remand the case to the trial court for entry of an order of commitment that places May into a tiered program of supervision and treatment. We conclude that the statute authorizing the civil commitment of sexually violent predators, as amended in 2015, is neither unconstitutionally retroactive nor punitive, nor has there been a denial , of May’s due process rights. We further conclude that the trial court’s findings of fact…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. McIntire v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In re StateTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  2. In re Commitment of MaresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. in Re Clarence D. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  4. in Re Timothy L. DannerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  5. Bertis Cupit v. Wellpath Recovery Solutions F/K/A Correct Care, LLC D/B/A CCRS of Texas, LLC and Management & Training Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2022

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API