Legal Opinion

in Re Commitment of David Dodson

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided May 29, 2014No. 09-13-00222-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOLLIS HORTON, Justice.

David Dodson appeals from a civil commitment order, rendered by the trial court following a trial 1 in 2013. At the trial’s conclusion, the jury found Dodson to be a sexually violent predator. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. §§ 841.001-.151 (West 2010 & Supp.2013) (SVP statute). In eight issues, Dodson challenges the constitutionality of the SVP statute, complains that State’s counsel was allowed to provide the jury with too much detail in opening statement about the evidence the jury would hear during the trial, argues that the opinions presented to the jury…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  4. City of San Antonio v. PollockTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Texas Department of Transportation v. SefzikTexas Supreme Court · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re Commitment of MayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. In re StateTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  3. David A. Dodson v. Marsha McLane and Management and Training CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2026
  4. Ex Parte Randy Louis Dupree v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2026
  5. In Re Commitment of Bryant Oliver Tutter v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2025

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API