Legal Opinion
Buckland v. Threshold Enterprises, Ltd.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 25, 2007No. B192832PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MANELLA, J.
When appellant Katherine Lee Buckland sought a preliminary injunction to prevent respondent Threshold Enterprises, Ltd. (Threshold), from selling its skin cream, Threshold demurred to Buckland’s first amended complaint, which alleged that the skin cream constituted a misbranded or mislabeled drug. The trial court sustained the demurrer with leave to amend, and denied Buckland’s request for injunctive relief on the ground that there was no operative complaint. After Buckland elected to stand on her complaint, judgments of dismissal were entered in favor of Threshold and the…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Linda RS v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Durell v. Sharp HealthcareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Birdsong v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Grayson v. AT & T CORP.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.