Legal Opinion
Phennel v. Roach
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided March 21, 1990No. 05-89-00762-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
BURNETT, Justice.
The February 21, 1990 opinion of this Court is withdrawn, and the following is now the opinion of this Court. The motion for rehearing of appellants, William Phen-nel and Twin City Fire Insurance Company, is overruled.
William Ray Phennel and Twin City Fire Insurance Company (Twin City) appeal a take nothing judgment entered by the trial court as sanctions, for Phennel’s failure to timely respond to discovery requests from Robbie J. Roach. In three points of error, appellants contend that: (1) the trial court abused its discretion by striking…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Bodnow Corp. v. City of HondoTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- McKinney v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Fort Worth Lloyds v. HaygoodTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Bailey v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- New York Underwriters Insurance Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
- Guillot v. HixTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Autry v. Dearman, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
- MacArangal v. Andrews, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- Hartford Casualty Insurance Co. v. Albertsons Grocery StoresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.