Legal Opinion
Fort Worth Lloyds v. Haygood
Texas Supreme Court
Decided January 23, 1952No. A-3228PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Griffin
On June 21, 1949, respondent, Tom E. Haygood, an employee of S. P. Braud Conveyor Service, was injured while installing in the plant of the Imperial Sugar Company certain machinery which the Conveyor Service had contracted with the Sugar Company to install. Haygood was paid $7139 as compensation for his injuries by petitioner, Fort Worth Lloyds, the compensation carrier of Conveyor Service under the Workmen’s Compensation statute. Thereafter, Haygood filed a suit against the Sugar Company, as a third party tort-feasor, and Fort Worth Lloyds intervened and sought recovery of the amount of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- G. A. Stowers Furniture Co. v. American Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
- Gussie Fox v. Dallas Hotel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1922
- Smith v. HengerTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- Underwriters v. Kirby Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. West Texas Utilities Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Argonaut Insurance Co. v. BakerTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Culver v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Texas Mutual Insurance Co. v. LedbetterTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- New York Underwriters Insurance Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
- Guillot v. HixTexas Supreme Court · 1992
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.