Legal Opinion

New York Underwriters Insurance Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided April 19, 1993No. 05-92-01200-CVPublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Justice.

This summary judgment case involves the attempt by Hartford, the workers’ compensation carrier, to recover benefits it paid to two injured workers from both State Farm, the third party tortfeasor’s liability carrier, and the two injured workers. The trial court awarded Hartford only the total amount of the settlement State Farm paid to the injured workers, Kanen and Wilkins. The trial court also awarded Kanen and Wilkins one-third of Hartford’s recovery as attorney’s fees. The trial court refused to award Hartford attorney’s fees.

Hartford contends it should have…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. " MOORE" BURGER, INC. v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  5. In the Interest of W.E.R.Texas Supreme Court · 1984

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Tompkins v. CyrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  2. Monroe v. Grider, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
  3. Alejandro v. Bell, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  4. Texas-Ohio Gas, Inc. v. Mecom, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  5. Price v. Short, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API