Legal Opinion

Autry v. Dearman

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided November 7, 1996No. 14-94-00661-CVPublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

This appeal concerns a workers’ compensation carrier’s subrogation rights to a third-party settlement pursuant to former article 8307 of the Revised Civil Statutes. After a work-related injury, Jesse Villegas (“Ville-gas”) received compensation and medical benefits from Texas Employers’ Insurance Association (now in receivership and referred to collectively with its receiver, Sandra A. Autry, as “TEIA”), which provided workers’ compensation insurance for Villegas’s employer. The attorney representing Villegas, appellees, William T. Dearman, Individually and d/b/a…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Trenholm v. RatcliffTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Elbaor v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1993

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Seureau v. ExxonMobil Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  2. Hunt v. Baldwin, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  3. Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A. v. RPK Capital XVI, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2012
  4. Employers Casualty Co. v. Dyess, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1997
  5. Wise, Curtis B. v. Sr Dallas, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API