Legal Opinion
Prekeges v. King County
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 30, 1999No. 41974-9-IPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.
The appellant petitioned for judicial review of a King County land use decision after missing the deadline for appealing to a hearing examiner. Because he actually saw notice of the project application, the defects in public notice of the application do not excuse him from the duty to exhaust administrative remedies. And he did not become entitled to mailed notice of the decision by leaving a voice mail message with the county. The trial court correctly dismissed his petition.
US West Wireless applied to King County for a conditional use permit to construct a 123 foot tall telecommunications…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Hama Hama Co. v. Shorelines Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Crosby v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Douchette v. Bethel School District No. 403Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. Board of Yakima County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Durland v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Witt v. Port of OlympiaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Witt v. Port of OlympiaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Nickum v. City of Bainbridge IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Nickum v. City of Bainbridge IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.