Legal Opinion
Witt v. Port of Olympia
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 5, 2005No. 31385-5-IIPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*754¶1 Janet Witt, a Land Use Petition Act (LUPA), chapter 36.70C RCW, petitioner, appeals a judgment in favor of the Port of Olympia in which the superior court ruled that she failed to properly serve the Port under RCW 36.70C.040(5) and RCW 4.28.080(9). She served her petitions on a part-time, temporary intern who was working at the Port’s front desk. Because the intern was not statutorily authorized to receive service for the Port, we affirm. And because we dismiss the case for a procedural flaw rather than a decision on the merits, we decline the Port’s request for attorney fees.
Armstrong, J.
F…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Union Bay Preservation Coalition v. Cosmos Development & Administration Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
- Union Bay Pres. Coal. v. COSMOS DEVELOP.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
- Citizens To Preserve Pioneer Park, L.L.C. v. City of Mercer IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- PIONEER PARK v. Mercer IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Overhulse Neighborhood Ass'n v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Durland v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Conom v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Conom v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Farmer v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Farmer v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.