Legal Opinion
Durland v. San Juan County
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 11, 2014No. Nos. 89293-8; 89745-0PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWiggins, J.
¶1 In this consolidated case, petitioners brought an untimely challenge to San Juan County’s issuance of a garage-addition building permit. Petitioners did not receive notice of the permit application and grant until the administrative appeals period had expired. Thus, petitioners claim that our court’s interpretation of the Land Use Petition Act (LUPA), chapter 36.70C RCW, required them to do the impossible: to appeal a decision without actual or constructive notice of it. While this result may seem harsh and unfair, to grant relief on these facts would be contrary to the statutory scheme…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Kut Suen Lui v. Essex Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
- Maytown Sand & Gravel, LLC v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- Joseph Workman v. Jerald F. KlinkenbergCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Roberta S. Podbielancik, App. v. Lpp Mortgage, Ltd, Res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Cave Properties v. City Of Bainbridge IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.