Legal Opinion

Trebus v. Davis

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1997No. CV-96-0563-PRPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Justice.

John Trebus moved to remand a grand jury’s indictment for a new determination of probable cause. See Rule 12.9, Ariz. R.Crim.P. Trebus contends the trial judge abused his discretion by refusing to remand this case because the prosecutor had deprived him of the right to make a written request to present explanatory evidence to the grand jury pursuant to A.R.S. § 21-412. We granted review to examine the responsibility of a prosecutor who learns that a defendant wishes to present exculpatory evidence or testify before a grand jury. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. United States v. Richard CiambroneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  3. State v. BaumannArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. Coconino Cty. Superior Ct., Div. IIArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. EmeryArizona Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Francis v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. Herrell v. SargeantArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Bashir v. PinedaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  4. Black v. CokerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. Aranzi Rae Jon Willis v. Hon. bernini/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2022

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API