Legal Opinion

Black v. Coker

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 8, 2011No. 1 CA-SA 10-0264PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IRVINE, Judge.

¶ 1 Dustin Black seeks relief from the trial court’s denial of his motion to remand the grand jury’s indictment for a new determina tion of probable cause. See Ariz.R.Crim.P. 12.9(a). Black contends the trial court erred because the prosecutor failed to inform the grand jury of his written request to appear and testify before it pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 21-412 (2002). We find that the prosecutor had a duty to inform the grand jury of Black’s request. Nevertheless, because Black did not provide the prosecutor with the subject and outline of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trebus v. DavisArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Maretick v. JarrettArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Francis v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trinh v. Hon garcia/stateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API