Herrell v. Sargeant
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELDMAN, Justice.
The court of appeals declined to accept jurisdiction of a petition for special action by which Phillip Herrell sought to obtain a remand to the grand jury for a new determination of probable cause. See Rule 12.9, Ariz. R.Crim.P. We granted review because we believe that the principles articulated by our previous cases required the trial court and the court of appeals to grant relief. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6 § 5(3), Rule 23, Ariz. R.Civ.App.P., and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Herrell’s pleadings in this court and the court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. Coconino Cty. Superior Ct., Div. IIArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. EmeryArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Crimmins v. SUPERIOR CT. IN & FOR MARICOPA CY.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Priestly v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Trebus v. DavisArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- Francis v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Bashir v. PinedaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Aranzi Rae Jon Willis v. Hon. bernini/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2022
- Soto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.