Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Coconino Cty. Superior Ct., Div. II

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1984No. 17116-SAPublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

139 Ariz. 422 (1984)

678 P.2d 1386

STATE of Arizona, Petitioner,

v.

COCONINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, DIVISION II, and the Honorable Richard K. Mangum, a judge thereof, Respondent Judge, William Carl MAURO, Respondent Real Party in Interest.

No. 17116-SA.

Supreme Court of Arizona, In Banc.

February 28, 1984.

John Verkamp, Coconino County Atty. by Michael G. Prost and Charles D. Adams, Flagstaff, for petitioner.

Aspey, Watkins & Diesel by Frederick M. Aspey, Flagstaff, for respondents.

HAYS, Justice.

William Carl Mauro was indicted by a Coconino County Grand Jury on one count of first degree murder (Count…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  2. United States v. Richard CiambroneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  3. King v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. O'DANIELHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. BaumannArizona Supreme Court · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. State v. CarrigerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. HoganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  3. State v. SweetArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. ClabourneArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1989

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API