Legal Opinion

Village of St. Johnsbury v. Cenedalla

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 5, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtles, J.

The plaintiff village in this action of tort seeks to recover damages alleged to have been caused to its water mains by the defendants by negligent use of explosives while engaged in highway construction or improvement under contract with the State of Vermont on U. S. Route No. 2, so-called, leading easterly from the Village of St. Johnsbury. Trial was by court with findings and judgment for the plaintiff, on exceptions to which the defendants come to this Court.

Some of the facts not in dispute are as follows: Stiles Pond had, for many years, been the principal source of water supply for the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wellman, Admr. v. WalesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  2. Wellman, Admr. v. WalesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  3. Lee v. DonnellySupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
  4. Hall v. Windsor Savings BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  5. Goodwin, Admx. v. GastonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Henderson and SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  2. Izor v. BrighamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  3. Putnam v. WoodardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
  4. Utley v. School District of WoodburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  5. Hastings v. Murray and BarcombSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API