Lee v. Donnelly
Supreme Court of Vermont
Action op Tort for negligence. Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury at the September Term, 1920, Rutland County, Chase, J., presiding. At the close of the evidence the Court directed a verdict for the defendant. Judgment on the verdict. The plaintiff excepted. The opinion states the case. 1 Lawrence, Lawrence & Stafford and Asa S. Bloomer for the plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtMiles, J.
This is an action of tort to recover for an injury alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant in the operation of an automobile. At the close of all the evidence; on motion of the defendant, a verdict was directed in his favor, to' which the plaintiff excepted, and the case comes here on 'that exception. The transcript of the evidence is referred to in the bill of exceptions and made controlling as part thereof, as to the tendency of the evidence.
The grounds of the motion were: (1) That there was no evidence in the' ease tending to show that the defendant was *124guilty of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Koplitz v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Wentworth v. Town of WaterburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
- Howe v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1917
- Benedict v. Union Agricultural SocietySupreme Court of Vermont · 1902
3Cited by30 opinions
- Wall v. . BainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Landry v. HubertSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- Taulborg v. AndresenNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
- Ronan v. J. G. Turnbull Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1926
- Robinson v. LeonardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.