Legal Opinion

Putnam v. Woodard

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 2, 1940PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, C. J.

On June 16, 1911, the plaintiff’s husband, E. S. Putnam, executed in duplicate a written contract whereby he agreed to sell a certain farm to Alvin'A. Woodard,, the husband of the defendant. The receipt of a down payment was acknowledged, the balance of the purchase price to bear interest at 5 % and to be payable in specified annual installments. There were other provisions to the effect that Woodard should pay insurance and taxes, and that three-fourths of the gross proceeds of all wood and lumber sold off the farm should be applied upon the principal sum but not upon the interest, but these…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Platt v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  2. McClary v. HubbardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  3. White River Chair Co. v. Connecticut River Power Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  4. Rutland Railway, Light & Power Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  5. Ward v. LymanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Russell v. PilgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1944
  2. Crawford v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
  3. Turner v. BraggSupreme Court of Vermont · 1943
  4. Sparrow v. CimonettiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1948
  5. Taylor v. Henderson and SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API