Legal Opinion

State ex rel. State Budget & Control Board v. City of Columbia

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 8, 1992No. 23678PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Chief Justice:

This is a declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration as to the legality of certain annexations made by the City of Columbia (the City). We reverse in part and remand in part.

I. FACTS

On December 6, 1989, the City purchased a strip of land approximately five feet wide and one-half mile long bordering the eastern shore of the Broad River just north of the point where the Broad River is traversed by Interstate Highway 20 (the five-foot strip). The City annexed this five-foot strip on December 20, 1989. Based on the strip’s alleged contiguity to other lands abutting…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Quinn v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. County of Lexington v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Condon v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. St. Andrews Public Service District v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Wilson v. Town of YemasseeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Beaufort County v. TraskCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  5. St. Andrews Public Service District v. City CouncilCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API