Legal Opinion
Beaufort County v. Trask
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided May 13, 2002No. 3490PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOOLSBY, Judge:
Appellants Beaufort County and Dorothy Gnann brought this action seeking a declaratory judgment invalidating an annexation ordinance enacted by the City of Beaufort (the City). The trial court held the annexation was proper and Appellants lacked standing to challenge the ordinance. We affirm.
FACTS
On January 11, 1999, Flora G. Trask petitioned to have the City annex both her property on Upper Cane Island and the portion of the Beaufort River located between the City and Trask’s property. Trask made her request using the “100-per cent” method under South Carolina Code section…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- First Savings Bank v. McLeanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Bryant v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
- Biales v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Shillito v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sloan v. Greenville CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Sonoco Products Co. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Found v. S.C. Dep't of Transp. & John V. WalshSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- Town of Arcadia Lakes v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
- South Carolina Public Interest Foundation v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017