St. Andrews Public Service District v. City of Charleston
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PLEICONES, Justice:
We granted certiorari to consider whether municipal annexations using roadways to achieve contiguity are “absolutely void as not authorized by law.” The Court of Appeals held that they may be, and therefore respondent, an entity with no interest in the property annexed, had standing to challenge the annexations. St. Andrews Public Serv. Dist. v. City Council of the City of Charleston, 339 S.C. 320, 529 S.E.2d 64 (Ct.App.2000). We reverse, and in so doing, overrule our decision in Quinn v. City of Columbia, 303 S.C. 405, 401 S.E.2d 165 (1991), to the extent it holdsoa…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bryant v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
- Glaze v. GroomsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Tovey v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
- State Ex Rel. Condon v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Quinn v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- ATC South, Inc. v. Charleston CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Sonoco Products Co. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Board of County Commissioners v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Wilson v. Town of YemasseeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Vicary v. Town of AwendawSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.