County of Lexington v. City of Columbia
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Gregory, Chief Justice:
Respondent (County) commenced this action for declaratory judgment alleging appellant’s (City’s) annexation of property located in County was invalid. The property was annexed *301by 100% landowner petition pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 5-3-150(3) (1976). City moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground County lacked standing to bring the action. The trial judge denied the motion. We reverse.
Generally, a county has the power to sue and be sued as a political body. S.C. Code Ann. § 4-1-10 (1986). As a political subdivision of the State, however, it lacks the sovereignty to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thompson v. South Carolina Commission on Alcohol & Drug AbuseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Capital View Fire District v. County of RichlandCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
- Richland County Recreation District v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Condon v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Tuma v. Kerr County, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
- State ex rel. State Budget & Control Board v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Clint Tuma and Amy Tuma v. Kerr County, Texas, a Political Subdivision of the State of Texas and Janie Whitt, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010