Legal Opinion

County of Lexington v. City of Columbia

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 21, 1991No. 23318PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Chief Justice:

Respondent (County) commenced this action for declaratory judgment alleging appellant’s (City’s) annexation of property located in County was invalid. The property was annexed *301by 100% landowner petition pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 5-3-150(3) (1976). City moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground County lacked standing to bring the action. The trial judge denied the motion. We reverse.

Generally, a county has the power to sue and be sued as a political body. S.C. Code Ann. § 4-1-10 (1986). As a political subdivision of the State, however, it lacks the sovereignty to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. South Carolina Commission on Alcohol & Drug AbuseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Capital View Fire District v. County of RichlandCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  3. Richland County Recreation District v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Condon v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Tuma v. Kerr County, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
  3. State ex rel. State Budget & Control Board v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Clint Tuma and Amy Tuma v. Kerr County, Texas, a Political Subdivision of the State of Texas and Janie Whitt, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API