Legal Opinion

State v. White

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1987No. TC 10-83-01183; CA A30237; SC S32313PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

The first issue is whether the prosecutor’s remarks in opening statement to the jury concerning defendant’s refusal to testify in his co-defendant’s trial were so prejudicial that a mistrial should have been declared. We hold that the remarks were that prejudicial and that the instruction given by the trial court in an attempt to cure the effect of the remarks was not sufficient to do so.

The second issue is whether defendant, who was here charged with aggravated murder, was entitled to a jury instruction that would have submitted to the jury whether defendant was guilty of manslaughter in the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Lakeside v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. MontezOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. FarrarOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Nelson v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. ChitwoodOregon Supreme Court · 2022

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API