Milne v. Milne Construction Co.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Plaintiff appeals a judgment for defendants in a contract action. He assigns error to the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants based on its conclusion that the parties’ contract was unambiguous. We conclude that the disputed contract term is ambiguous and that there is a genuine issue of material fact about its meaning. Hence, the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to defendants. We reverse.
In an appeal of a summary judgment, we review the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party to determine whether the moving party is entitled to judgment as a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. WebbOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Batzer Construction, Inc. v. John BoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Deerfield Commodities, Ltd. v. Nerco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Emmert v. No Problem Harry, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Adair Homes, Inc. v. Dunn Carney Allen Higgins & Tongue, LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- DCIPA, LLC v. Lucile Slater Packard Children's Hospital at StanfordDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011
- Central Or. Independ. Health Serv. v. OmapCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Cryo-Tech, Inc. v. JKC Bend, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.