Legal Opinion

Keller v. Pacific Turf Club

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 17, 1961No. Civ. 18812PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.

Plaintiff, Dan Keller, seeks to recover damages for breach of contract from Pacific Turf Club, a California corporation, and its officers, hereafter referred to as defendants. At the close of plaintiff’s case, the court granted defendants’ motion for a nonsuit and plaintiff appeals. We conclude that the matter should have gone to the jury.

The granting of a motion for a nonsuit is warranted 11 ‘. . . when, and only when, disregarding conflicting evidence, and giving to plaintiff’s evidence all the value to which it is legally entitled, indulging in every legitimate inference which may be drawn…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Raber v. TuminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Blumberg v. M. & T. IncorporatedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Card v. BomsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. White Lighting Co. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Ripani v. Liberty Loan Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Plumlee v. PoagCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. White Lighting Co. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API