Legal Opinion

Hoyle v. Utica Mutual Insurance

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 2002No. 27142PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Chief Justice.

Richard W. Hoyle (“Hoyle”) and Hoyle & Associates Insurance, Inc. (“HAII”) appeal the district judge’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Utica Mutual Insurance Company (“Utica”) and Employers Reinsurance Corporation (“ERC”).

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

HAII is an insurance ageney/brokerage firm formed by Hoyle in 1979. On January 1, 1996, HAII entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement "with First Security Insurance, Inc. (“FSI”) whereby FSI agreed to acquire substantially all of the assets of HAII. Under the Asset Purchase Agreement, FSI essentially operated…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Compass Insurance Co. v. City of LittletonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  2. Hirst v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Jaffe v. Cranford InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. McKay v. OwensIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Sun Valley Potatoes, Inc. v. Rosholt, Robertson & TuckerIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Derderian v. Essex InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  2. County of Boise v. Idaho Counties Risk Management ProgramIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Hartman v. United Heritage Property & Casualty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Idaho Counties Risk Management Program Underwriters v. Northland Insurance CompaniesIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. AMCO Insurance v. Tri-Spur Investment Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API