Legal Opinion

East Lizard Butte Water Corp. v. Howell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1992No. 19772PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDEVITT, Justice.

Defendants appeal from summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Plaintiff instituted this action seeking to quiet title to three “well lots” in Hagen’s Mobile Estates Subdivision in Canyon County. The plaintiff sought title to the lots in question on the theory of adverse possession. The defendants urged that the plaintiff’s use of the lots was permissive and title should be quieted in favor of the defendants. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff and entered a decree quieting title in favor of the plaintiff. *680From this decree, defendants…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. EthingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Doe v. DurtschiIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Anderson v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Petricevich v. Salmon River Canal CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Evans v. Twin Falls CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. StevensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Grace v. KochOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Thomson v. Idaho Insurance Agency, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Rhodehouse v. StuttsIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Ivey v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1992

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API