Ex Parte Tharp
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAUPHINOT, Justice.
In this case, we consider whether the administrative driver’s license suspension under Texas Revised Civil Statute article 6687b-l 1 constitutes punishment for the purposes of double jeopardy analysis. 2 We grant Appellant’s motion to amend his sole point of error and, consequently, our review of this issue will be limited only to the double jeopardy protection found in the United States Constitution, as no independent state constitutional claim has been asserted.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
James Martin Tharp, Appellant, was stopped and arrested on suspicion of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Tharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- State v. MayoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- Grotti v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Ex Parte Arnold, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. Monroe, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.