Legal Opinion

Grotti v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 17, 2006No. 2-04-406-CRPublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TERRIE LIVINGSTON, Justice.

Pursuant to rule of appellate procedure 50, we have reconsidered our previous opinion on the State’s petition for discretionary review. See Tex.R.App. P. 50. We withdraw our judgment and opinion dated September 14, 2006 and substitute the following primarily to revise the factual sufficiency standard of review to comport with the court of criminal appeals’s opinion in Watson v. State, 204 S.W.3d 404, 414-15 (Tex.Crim.App.2006), which was handed down after our original opinion issued.

I. Introduction

A grand jury…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Grotti v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  2. Marchbanks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  3. Nevarez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
  4. Capps v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  5. John Anthony Adams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2013

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API