Legal Opinion

Murdock v. Swanson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 6, 1948No. Civ. 3597PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an action to recover on a claim based upon an alleged oral contract to make a will. The property left by the deceased was reduced to cash amounting to $50,827.61 and the plaintiff filed an amended claim in the estate for that amount, which was rejected. The plaintiff then brought this “Action to Impress a Trust, Specific Performance and on a Claim.” After the filing of a second amended complaint demurrers were sustained without leave to amend as to the first cause of action, and with leave to amend as to the second cause of action. The plaintiff, having refused to amend, has appealed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Morrison v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Long v. RumseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Ruinello v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Shive v. BarrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Walker v. CallowayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Munoz v. Kaiser Steel Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API