Legal Opinion

Munoz v. Kaiser Steel Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 4, 1984No. Civ. 29347PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUFMAN, Acting P. J.

Anthony Munoz (plaintiff) filed an amended complaint against Kaiser Steel Corporation (Kaiser or defendant) alleging one cause of action for breach of an oral employment contract for a minimum of three years and another cause of action for fraud and deceit based on the oral promise of three years’ employment without intention to perform. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment was granted as to the cause of action fgr.,bx,e£<?h,of egntract on the basis of the statute of frauds. A second motion for summary judgment on the fraud count was denied. However, a nonsuit…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Merrill v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Sorosky v. Burroughs Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Malmstrom v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Aguilera v. Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Robinson v. Hewlett-Packard Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Burton v. Security Pacific Nat. BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API