Lund v. Lachman
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. B. V. Sargent, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
This is an action for damages for the alleged breach of a contract to purchase personal property. The appeal is from the judgment in favor of the defendant and from the order denying a new trial.
The facts of the case as revealed by the pleadings and proof are substantially these: On November 30 and December 1, 1910, the defendant entered into two contracts with the plaintiffs for the purchase of certain specified quantities of claret quart bottles, to be shipped from Sweden during-the months of February or March, 1911. The contract price was $5.85 per gross, and delivery was to be made from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Broads v. Mead and CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Hill v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Cuthill v. PeabodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Kenyon v. Western Union Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Maher v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ferreira v. Honolulu Star-Bulletin, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1960
- Thompson v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1944
- Stevens v. MitchellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
- Keister v. O'NeilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Brooks v. MuthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.