Legal Opinion

Keister v. O'Neil

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1943No. Civ. 12399PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment based on the verdict of a jury in an action for damages. There is no claim made that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict or judgment, but it is urged that the court erred in giving and refusing to give certain instructions and in ruling on the admissibility of evidence. We are of the opinion that no grounds for reversal have been established.

The parties sued were the respondent, a regularly licensed and practicing physician and surgeon, and a corporation operating a general hospital. The complaint contained three counts, the first of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schmeltz v. TracySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  2. Kenyon v. Western Union Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Stewart v. SeftonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Adams v. BoyceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Lund v. LachmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Steele v. WoodsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Ashcraft v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Govin v. HunterWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Sweet v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Conte v. Girard Orthopaedic Surgeons Medical Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API