Legal Opinion

Marriage of Blomgren v. Blomgren

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 21, 1985No. C6-84-2053PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

Appellant Judith A. Blomgren appeals from the order of the trial court denying her motion for increased child support. The trial court granted a cost of living escalator based on actual cost of living increases granted to respondent Donald Blomgren by his employer.

We remand.

FACTS

On January 3, 1972, a judgment and decree was entered dissolving the parties’ marriage. Judith Blomgren was granted custody of the parties’ daughter Nancy, born on December 2, 1969 and pursuant to the agreement of the parties, respondent Donald Blomgren was ordered to pay $150 per month for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hadrava v. HadravaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Marriage of Derence v. DerenceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Heaton v. HeatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Marriage of Blomgren v. BlomgrenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Thompson v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Marriage of Grachek v. GrachekCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  4. Marriage of Kehr v. KehrCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Marriage of Martin v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API