Thompson v. Newman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant Jane Thompson appeals from a trial court order that increased child support payable by respondent Bruce Newman to an amount less than that specified in the child support payment guidelines. On appeal, Thompson argues: (1) that a downward deviation from the guidelines was not justified; (2) that the trial court erred by not considering Minn.Stat. § 518.17 subd. 4(c) (1984) when setting the child support level; (3) that the trial court erred by not including Newman’s rental income as a part of Newman’s income; (4) that health insurance is an obligation separate…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gomez v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- In Re the Marriage of DuBois v. DuBoisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Marriage of Kreidler v. KreidlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of Blomgren v. BlomgrenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Scott v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Quaderer v. ForrestCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Pitkin v. GrossCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Sherburne County Social Services Ex Rel. Schafer v. RiedleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Gilbertson v. GraffCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Carver County Community Social Services v. FritzkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.