Marriage of Blomgren v. Blomgren
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
This appeal is from the trial court’s findings of fact issued after the remand ordered in Blomgren v. Blomgren, 367 N.W.2d 918 (Minn.Ct.App.1985). Appellant Judith Blomgren claims the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to order an increase in child support and include the statutory cost-of-living adjustment. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
FACTS
Judith and Donald Blomgren were divorced in January 1972. Child support was stipulated at $153 per month for their daughter, Nancy. At the time his gross annual income was approximately $10,000. On May…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moylan v. MoylanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Kiesow v. KiesowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Marriage of Derence v. DerenceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Wiese v. WieseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Marriage of Winter v. WinterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rueckert v. RueckertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Marriage of Krogstad v. KrogstadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Marriage of McClenahan v. WarnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Marriage of Braatz v. BraatzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Wicks v. FalkowskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.