Legal Opinion

Snowden v. Anderson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1908No. 7638Published

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered February 26, 1908, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for partition.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

— This action was brought for the partition of certain real estate in Pierce county. The principal issue in the case was whether the whole tract of thirty-two acres should be partitioned, or only twenty-two acres thereof. Upon a trial, the court entered a decree setting off sixteen acres on the east side of the tract to the plaintiffs, ten acres on the -west side to defendants Brady and wife, and six acres between these two tracts to defendants Anderson and wife. The defendants Anderson and wife have appealed from that decree.

The facts are as follows: ' This tract of thirty-two acres of land…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Collins v. GleasonWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Sweeney v. Frank Waterhouse & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Anderson v. SnowdenWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Carmean v. North American Transportation & Trading Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Spring Hill Irrigation Co. v. Lake Irrigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API