Sweeney v. Frank Waterhouse & Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered February Y, 1906, in favor of the defendant, upon overruling a demurrer to the plea of former adjudication, dismissing an action for the nondelivery of a consignment of freight.
1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.
Heretofore the appellants commenced an action in the superior court of King county against the retspondent, for the nondelivery of freight shipped hy appellants hy way of respondent’s ship “Garonne,” consigned to appellants at Home Anchorage, Alaska. It developed in the trial of said cause that appellants had assigned the cargo before its arrival at Home. A judgment was entered dismissing the action, which judgment was affirmed hy this court in *616the case of Sweeney v. Waterhouse & Co., 39 Wash. 501, 81 Pac. 1005. Thereafter the appellants commenced this action, alleging among other things that,
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stevick v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Sweeney v. Frank Waterhouse & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by11 opinions
- Perlus v. SilverWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Rauer v. RyndCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Sound Built Homes, Inc. v. Windermere Real Estate/South, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Trane Co. v. Randolph Plumbing & HeatingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- Thompson v. Washington National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.