Anderson v. Snowden
Washington Supreme Court
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Chapman, J., entered April 18, 1906, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, dismissing an action to quiet title without granting relief to either party.
1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, J.
This is an action to quiet title. The material facts occurring prior to the 5th day of December, 1904, are recited and embodied in a written memorandum of that date, prepared by the plaintiff James J. Anderson, and signed by him and the defendant C. A. Snowden. The memorandum is as follows:
“This memorandum witnesseth, that, heretofore, in the month of September, 1904, the undersigned entered into three contracts of purchase of thirty-two acres of land, being all of the N. E. quarter of S. E. quarter, Section Two, Township 20, North, Range 3 East of W. M., excepting a strip of eight acres off…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Calkins v. SteinbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by6 opinions
- Costello v. CunninghamArizona Supreme Court · 1915
- Falaschi v. YowellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- Dwight v. WaldronWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- George v. TannerIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
- George v. TannerIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.