Legal Opinion
Mathis v. Bocell
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided July 30, 1998No. 01-96-00885-CVPublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HEDGES, Justice.
In this medical malpractice ease, Nancy Mathis, M.D. and Gary Mathis (“plaintiffs”) appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of appellees, James R. Bocell, M.D. and Thomas Cain, M.D. In their sole point of error, Nancy and Gary Mathis complain that (1) the summary judgment evidence did not establish the absence of material fact issues and (2) the affidavits of Drs. Bocell and Cain were legally insufficient to support a summary judgment. We reverse and remand.
BACKGROUND
On September 14, 1992, Dr. David Lintner performed an arthroscopy of the lateral meniscus of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Birchfield v. Texarkana Memorial HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Anderson v. SniderTexas Supreme Court · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Green v. Industrial Specialty Contractors, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
- Keeton v. Carrasco, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
- Stone v. Midland Multifamily Equity REIT, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
- Trusty v. Strayhorn, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
- Scripps Texas Newspapers v. Belalcazar, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.