Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Snider
Texas Supreme Court
Decided May 30, 1991No. D-0422PublishedCited by 277 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam
We grant Petitioner’s motion for rehearing and issue the following opinion. Jimmie Anderson retained attorney Walter Snider to represent her in her divorce and child custody action. Due to alleged acts and omissions in the course of this representation, Anderson filed suit against Snider asserting claims of legal malpractice, breach of contract and violations of the Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act. Anderson, who is not an attorney, is proceeding pro se. Snider filed a motion for summary judgment supported by his affidavit as an expert witness,…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Rosas v. Buddies Food StoreTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Mercer v. Daoran Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Hidalgo v. Surety Savings and Loan AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Shook v. HermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Associates Discount Corp. v. Rattan Chevrolet, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by277 opinions
- Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- Burrow v. ArceTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Earle v. RatliffTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Wadewitz v. MontgomeryTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Rizkallah v. Conner, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
272 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.