Legal Opinion

Salas v. Cortez

California Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1979No. L.A. 30971PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BIRD, C. J.

— In these consolidated appeals, this court must decide whether due process requires the appointment of counsel to represent indigent defendants in law suits brought at the behest of the state to determine the parentage of minor children.

I

Salas v. Cortez

Julia Salas, the mother of a child born out of wedlock, received welfare benefits from Ventura County under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program. Suit was filed in order to (1) establish that Miguel Martinez Cortez was the father of the child and (2) obtain child support. The Ventura County District…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. People v. GeigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. SantosWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Corra v. CollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Cunningham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API